June 13, 2010 at 3:33 pm /
#3892
I’m wondering myself if this is ‘merge’ or the other options, such as ‘union’, ‘intersection’ and ‘difference’, which do not preserve texture information.
June 13, 2010 at 3:33 pm /
#22906
In 8.2, I find that when merging two primitives which have been textured, the resulting unified primitive has lost all the texture information. In more complicated merges, I find additional polygons are frequently created which I then need to delete.
BFM
June 14, 2010 at 11:53 am /
#22907
If I’m not mistaking merging of two textured primitives had this behaviour in earlier versions also.
Actually depends if you do a union, subtraction or simple merge object (that does not affect any polygons).
If the merge in any way affects the polygons texturing is lost.
You must be logged in to reply in this thread.