andnbsp; andnbsp; I have the Geforce 2 mx 400 32 meg…Having a 64meg video card might be worth paying the extra cash. My next card will be a 64 meg card. Think about not only now but as games getting more graphically intense more memory is better. Just my opinion..
Well, I think it’s about time I got a new 3D card for my PC, but I’m not sure what make or model would work best for my PC and 3DC. I don’t have loads of cash, so a relatively cheap card is what I’m looking for. I have win98, should I upgrade to XP first? Thanks in advance.
I found my XP vs Me benchmarks (this is with a Radeon based card):
Open 3DC
Me: 8.5 seconds
XP: 3.5 seconds
Drag and Drop a Surface object
Me: 18 seconds
XP: [2 seconds – pretty much instantaneous
And it is not just loading that is faster, a number of other functions are much faster under XP than Me. Some of the load spead can be attributed to the fact that it was a andquot;freshandquot; install, but not the Drag and Drop issue.
Richard
I think it depends on what you currently have. I don’t see much reason for having a video card better than a GeForce2 MX or Radeon Value edition for the purposes of 3DC. But, having XP can make a large difference in the performance of 3DC.
Richard
andnbsp; andnbsp; Hi Dood3. I have a Geforce 2 mx 400. You can get those cheap around $50..However you should be able to get a Geforce 3 these days pretty cheap too. In fact I will prolly be upgrading myself soon.
Does it matter which make of GeForce I get? The cheapest that I have found online is for 79:
Leadtek GeForce2 MX-200 32Mb + S.TV.
But for 99,40, I can get:
MSI Geforce2 MX 400 64 Mb + S.TV.
Could you help me, please? Is it worth it paying 20 extra for the MX 400, or should I just go for the MX 200?
Oh yes, and I cannot find the Radeon Value edition anywhere, so I do not know its pricing.
Okay, thanks people <!– s:) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!– s:) –>
Again, thanks.
You must be logged in to reply in this thread.