April 18, 2011
at 10:05 pm /
#4536
[code:1kpscgug]bo01
|__ bo01wh01
| |__ shapes
|__ bo01wh02
| |__ shapes
|
|__ 2_1200_bo01
| |__ shapes
|__ shapes[/code:1kpscgug]
[code:1kpscgug]1_0100_bo01
|__ 1_0100_bo01wh01
| |__ shapes
|__ 1_0100_bo01wh02
| |__ shapes
|
|__ 2_1200_bo01
| |__ shapes
|__ shapes
[/code:1kpscgug]
Hello,
I’m using the "no distance levels" option in the exporter (So I can specify lods in the group names, otherwise 1_1000_ is automatically added).
I tried to have some LOD in the bogies but I couldn’t make it work: with the above hierarchies, bogies and other objects disappear .
As soon as the 2_1200_bo01 hierarchy is removed, bogies and missing objects are back.
Thanks for ideas on the problem.
April 23, 2011
at 2:34 pm /
#25509
Same problem. Both bogies and doors disappear if I use the heirarchy suggested by Paul at <!– l –><a class="postlink-local" href="http://amabilis.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4003&p=22530&hilit=lods#p22530">viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4003&p=22530&hilit=lods#p22530</a><!– l –>. If I try to use the custom LODS, the program crashes. Automatic generated LODS do work.
BFM
April 21, 2012
at 3:35 am /
#25511
bump" Now did anyone ever sort this problem of having LODs in bogies. I am working on a project and seems I may have the same problem.
Was there a way around the problem, or is it just a matter of no LOD on bogies
April 21, 2012
at 9:14 am /
#25512
Hello,
I don’t remember how I solved this, but here are the export options I used and a hierarchy example. No problems now.
May 4, 2012
at 11:24 am /
#25510
Hi,
Another option that always works (when exporting custom LODs) is to create several first-level LOD groups in the bogie group, but no second- or third level groups.
For example:
[code:8hqk0wxw]1_0200_bo01
1_0100_bo01wh01
1_0100_bo01wh02
1_0500_mediumparts
1_1000_distantparts
[/code:8hqk0wxw]
Cheers,
Michael
May 7, 2012
at 4:37 pm /
#25513
Hi Michael, I am not sure if what you posted will work correctly. You have the parent group using a lower LOD than the distant parts group. Shouldn’t it be:
[code:28nhzs62]1_1000_bo01
1_0100_bo01wh01
1_0100_bo01wh02
1_0500_mediumparts
1_1000_distantparts[/code:28nhzs62]
BTW I use a similar grouping based on the examples you sent me a couple months back. Works like a charm! <!– s:) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt="
" title="Smile" /><!– s:) –>
