3DC 6.0 Poll

Richard,

I think that your proposed approach is the correct one. andnbsp;Once you are satisified that your vision for the modeling tools has been achieved, then you will have established a genuine baseline. andnbsp;As much as I like having everything in a tool box, its generally true that my choices would be different than someone else’s. andnbsp;It all depends on what one uses 3DC for. andnbsp;Your poll is a good idea, and depending on the results, it can provide a roadmap for future feature enhancement. andnbsp;Thanks again for all the effort you have put into 3DC.

Hi All,

This is the first poll on the new and improved forums.

I will be using this poll to decide on priorities for 6.0.

Richard

<!– s;) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><!– s;) –> hi Richard , i think all of the above but

particularly i have andnbsp;a suggestion on animation :

for example when you animate objects, i wish the object wouldnt start moving at the get go andnbsp;example:

zooming in on table with quarter on it, when you get to a closeup of the quarter, id like it to move then, but currently it moves little by little from frame 1

also wanted to say , i like the new look of the forum!!

keep up the very good work!!

David

Richard,

I’m for all of the above, however I selected the improved modeling features as the focus for the poll. I would have chosen improved u-v unwrapping as a second. andnbsp;Your discussion on a separate thread about improvements to the extrusion process even beyond 5.5 Rev 4 support my choice.

Charles

I m for everything above. But improved modelling and imports exports goes first.

Seravajan

Richard,
I would also have chosen all the above, well except for number 7 of course.. ;D

Good luck with v6.0 and keep up the great work!

Les

D all of the above <!– s:) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!– s:) –>

keep up the great work Richard.

In the improved modeling section I would like to see object to object manipulations. Like moving a cone on a cylinder by using the center of the cone’s round face on the cylinder’s top round face.

Seravajan

Hmmm, I wonder how people expect Richard to prioritize when everyone says All of the above. ???

You have my vote for what I’s prefer most… I’m glad you asked.

Alex/All,

I am leaning towards better modelling tools myself. I think the tools that exist already are quite good (if I do say so myself), but I think one more revision would fulfill my andquot;visionandquot; for the 3DC modelling tools.

But, if the poll points another direction, I will go that direction. That’s what the poll is for.

Richard

You must be logged in to reply in this thread.