April 3, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#3457
Richard,
I think that your proposed approach is the correct one. andnbsp;Once you are satisified that your vision for the modeling tools has been achieved, then you will have established a genuine baseline. andnbsp;As much as I like having everything in a tool box, its generally true that my choices would be different than someone else’s. andnbsp;It all depends on what one uses 3DC for. andnbsp;Your poll is a good idea, and depending on the results, it can provide a roadmap for future feature enhancement. andnbsp;Thanks again for all the effort you have put into 3DC.
April 3, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21804
Hi All,
This is the first poll on the new and improved forums.
I will be using this poll to decide on priorities for 6.0.
Richard
April 3, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21805
<!– s;) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_wink.gif" alt="" title="Wink" /><!– s;) –> hi Richard , i think all of the above but
particularly i have andnbsp;a suggestion on animation :
for example when you animate objects, i wish the object wouldnt start moving at the get go andnbsp;example:
zooming in on table with quarter on it, when you get to a closeup of the quarter, id like it to move then, but currently it moves little by little from frame 1
also wanted to say , i like the new look of the forum!!
keep up the very good work!!
David
April 4, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21806
Richard,
I’m for all of the above, however I selected the improved modeling features as the focus for the poll. I would have chosen improved u-v unwrapping as a second. andnbsp;Your discussion on a separate thread about improvements to the extrusion process even beyond 5.5 Rev 4 support my choice.
Charles
April 4, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21807
I m for everything above. But improved modelling and imports exports goes first.
Seravajan
April 4, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21808
Richard,
I would also have chosen all the above, well except for number 7 of course..
Good luck with v6.0 and keep up the great work!
Les
April 5, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21809
D all of the above <!– s:) –><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!– s:) –>
keep up the great work Richard.
April 5, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21810
In the improved modeling section I would like to see object to object manipulations. Like moving a cone on a cylinder by using the center of the cone’s round face on the cylinder’s top round face.
Seravajan
April 5, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21811
Hmmm, I wonder how people expect Richard to prioritize when everyone says All of the above. ???
You have my vote for what I’s prefer most… I’m glad you asked.
April 6, 2002
at 12:00 pm /
#21812
Alex/All,
I am leaning towards better modelling tools myself. I think the tools that exist already are quite good (if I do say so myself), but I think one more revision would fulfill my andquot;visionandquot; for the 3DC modelling tools.
But, if the poll points another direction, I will go that direction. That’s what the poll is for.
Richard